Here's an article I picked up at Fjordman's excellent blog, who picked up the original article (in Swedish). The Translation is the courtesy of a Swedish site called Watch, definately worth checking out.

"Pekgul leaves suburb because of violence"

"Nalin Pekgul, well-known social democratic advocate of suburbs with a high concentration of immigrants, is leaving her own suburb Tensta because she thinks it has become to insecure. Tensta has become too dangerous for the children, she says. ... She says to P1 Studio Ett that the reasons why she wants to move is the increasing violence and the religious fundamentalism in Tensta. The triggering factor was an incident in connection with the Tensta Market earlier this autumn, when a man was hurt by gunshots close to the family's apartment. "I was on my way home with my son. There was blood everywhere. It's not funny for an eight-year old to have to see something like that," says Nalin Pekgul. According to rumours, the man survived because he wore a bulletproof vest. A circumstance which also worried Nalin Pekgul. "I understood then that many are wearing bulletproof vests here. What has happened here, I wondered. Is this Tensta? I must have missed what has happened here the last years."

Nalin Pekgul says that she avoids to arrive home late in the evening nowadays. "Someone always has to meet me at the subway station if I arrive home late," she says. ... Nalin Pekgul, who is a Muslim herself, has also noted that fundamentalistic variants of Islam are growing stronger in Tensta. Her children come home and wonder why their mother don't wear a hijab or why their family don't go to the mosque. They also have heard that Muslims are better than Christians. "I don't like it when my son comes home and says that 'Mom, we Muslims don't lie, but Christians do, because they don't have God.' He hasn't got that from us. We had not reckoned on this religious fundamentalism," she says. Nalin Pekgul and her family are now looking for an apartment in a more mixed area, with both immigrants and ethnic Swedes."

And so the break-down of law and order and the disintegration of Swedish society progresses, little by little. When will 'critical mass' be reached? Perhaps that thin red line has already been passed long since? Are we powerless to stop the development or at least solve it in a peaceful manner? Will it be 'solved' at all? Many questions, and the only answer is, that time will tell.

Growing Islamic fundamentalism, as mentioned in the article, will make the Nordic nations increasingly vulnerable to terrorist attacks as well as a base for terrorist organizations. How mass-immigration, which Europe has been and continues to be the subject of, can be seen as a solution to anything, such as low-birth rates and an aging population, is beyond me. It can only be a temporary 'solution', even if it paid off. If we expect that the new-comers will continue to have high birth-rates in the future as well, then we are admitting that we expect the native population to become a minority within its own country at some point. This is already facing many major European cities during the first half of this century. Why is this desirable? When will we become convinced, that a multicultural society is in no way a 'better' society? How many failed experiments must we witness with our own eyes? Why must we, the natives of the land, accept being the subject of increasing attacks and harrassment from people who supposedly are our guests? Why must our women be more afraid at night?

Why must we create ethnic strife and tension where none existed?